Our project had wows; it was well designed although our presentation was not to par. I feel that we will improve on it. Our Ideas have been well communicated. Our promotion was trough pamphlets, billboards, and word of mouth. We were very selective “evaluating various needs or opportunities, and then deciding which of these should move forward as a project to be implemented,” in the design to sale Veer Tower condos. It did target specific men, had contracts, and produced a design solution. Although I think our presentation came in second. I think we did a good job presenting our information. I think the technology should have been better and that is where we failed and aside from not understand that it had to be presented as if we were in front of Veer management. I think we will take the next step and make it better.
The 4 Interior Design team project was well designed, they communicated their idea very well, and got their word out. Their creativity, technology and viability showed in their presentation. Although it was short and brief they gave a lot of information and presented “the project objective, very clear, attainable, specific, and measurable.” I applaud them for giving a good presentation.
The 4 Interior Design group did a better job in presenting their idea. I think they did a better job in “terminating the project effectively.” Both teams developed networking information, produced a design solution, and applied the principles. All of the presentations where specific, Measurable, agreed upon, realistic, and timed framed.
No comments:
Post a Comment